Stanley Brodie QC says the UK left the EU on the 29th March 2019

Stanley Brodie QC has written an article where he details that the UK, has legally left the EU as of the 29th of March 2019 and he explains that not only is that clear in law, but also that the way the law was presented to Parliament was illegally modified.

Whichever way one looks at it, the Agreement was either unlawful or made for an unlawful purpose or ultra vires .That means that the UK left the EU on the 29th March 2019 by default as there was no valid or lawful impediment to prevent it.

The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

The proviso could not be used to reopen, or continue, never ending debate. Nor can it be used as a general power to extend time.

The Article 50 period is set at 2 years unless, as provided for in Article 50 “the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend [it]”.

So the version put out by the civil servants was false. The differences in meaning between the two versions were considerable.

So the civil servants responsible for briefing parliament to enable an informed debate to take place, themselves were misleading it. The alteration of the text of Article 50, and of the proviso to paragraph 3, must have been deliberate.

This is a truly alarming state of affairs; it should be exposed sooner rather than later.

CONCLUSIONS

Stating the outcome shortly, it would seem to be as follows:
(i) The application by the Prime Minister for an extension of time until June 30th under the proviso to Article 50, made on or about the 14th March 2019, was legally valid, but was rejected by the EU.

(ii) This was followed by the Agreement proposed by the EU. It did not comply with the terms of the proviso; nor was Article 50 referred to or relied on by the EU. It was not effective to stop the Article 50 process running up to and including the 29th March at 11 p.m. Whichever way one looks at it, the Agreement was either unlawful or made for an unlawful purpose or ultra vires .That means that the UK left the EU on the 29th March 2019 by default as there was no valid or lawful impediment to prevent it.

 

COMMENT

This should come as no surprise to anyone who has taken an objective view of the entire EU experiment. The British public were led in the EEC with lies, by Edward Heath and Margaret Thatcher, because they knew that the people would not support the real agenda behind joining.

We were lied to again and again, whilst the political classes pushed ahead with their agenda for ever closer union, in total contempt of the people.

Read the full article written by Stanley Brodie QC

ARTICLE 50 – TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION

24
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
William Selka
Guest
William Selka

Can we have our money back then?

Paul Sheldon-Matthews
Guest
Paul Sheldon-Matthews

Hopefully Robin Tilbrooks current Legal case in support of the above will be heard at the High Court and prove that we are already out of the EU. I do not hold my breath though because of our biased PRO EU Judiciary at the top.

Valerie kerr
Guest
Valerie kerr

How can these other cases be heard and decided immediately and the Tillbrook case is taking so long

Linda Patton
Guest
Linda Patton

Why has NO ONE in the Common, or even one MP/MEP mentioned this case there is no doubt they ALL know about are they trying to betray the British people again hoping that if they don’t acknowledge it doesn’t exist, WHAT will happen IF and it’s a big if we actually get a court date and a miracle happens that we don’t get a remain/bias judge who states that we have left on 29th March 2019???

maggie may
Guest
maggie may

I don’t get why this man isn’t shouting it from the roof tops. He’s in a position to put it right and let every single person in this country know this important information and he could have backed up Robin Tillbrook in his plight to prove the same. He’s also in a high up position to get on national TV news and let everyone know. I get so mad when i happen to stumble onto stuff like this ’cause I know it was only by accident that I saw it which makes me think not many other people will see… Read more »

Trev Gillett
Guest
Trev Gillett

State of play- proceeding slowly, but bound to succeed.
http://casetracker.justice.gov.uk/getDetail.do?case_id=20191534

GEOFF S.WILLIAMS
Guest
GEOFF S.WILLIAMS

This sounds very plausible, amazing even, but is It CORRECT. Who is telling the truth, How many times has the legal position changed, who can we believe? How many QC’S does it take to CHANGE A LOOPHOLE?
If this is THE LEGAL RULING TELL EVERYONE!.

Angela Harris
Guest
Angela Harris

If we have left why the mp saying we haven’t so how can Boris go to jail to say no deal??

Keith Spalding
Guest
Keith Spalding

Should this situation be legal fact undisbutable, then why are we pursuing any further with an agreement.

Theresa stockland
Guest
Theresa stockland

So why are we still negotiating with the EU if this is correct by default ,and why is our judicial system not agreeing with this and interfering with government policies? As a lay person you cannot have one law for one person and not everyone!! Or am I stupid,,

Dave Crowley
Guest
Dave Crowley

This fact was taken to court by the British Democrats and thrown out as no case to answer or a similar reason.
If this article is correct, it means our courts are totally corrupt and most certainly not independent.

Betty Bullen
Guest
Betty Bullen

I have just read article 61,find it on Google, see what everyone thinks

Michael Dickinson
Guest
Michael Dickinson

It had Absolutely Nothing to do with Margaret Thatcher, SIMPLES

meurig davies
Guest
meurig davies

Why o why is this not made public and legally perused by the Tory’s just make sure they don’t get that Scottish idiot judge

Sylvia June Holmes
Guest
Sylvia June Holmes

Yes we certainly were lied to in the 70’s,we believed the treaty was for common market of goods,primarily foodstuffs….we were shown no information about union of countries governments,superstate,taxing proposals,or anything else.

Ian Hart
Guest
Ian Hart

Who are the law makers – very confused with the. All

William Selka
Guest
William Selka

The refusal by the establishment to accept this, with them trying to stifle discussion by blocking the Robin Tilbrook case, is scary and infuriating in equal measure.

Betty Bullen
Guest
Betty Bullen

I am in touch with Robin Tilbrook who, as you will probably know is trying again to get it through court. I recantly read about article 61,would this help us?

Barbara Wiltshire
Guest
Barbara Wiltshire

Why is it remain’s court cases get heard and decisions made immediately yet the Brexit one seems to be dragging along like a ton weight? Is there no way we can get a decision from impartial or non EU funded judges? It seems dreadful that our laws are being broken and bent by remain MPs with impunity, whilst those same lawbreakers claim they are doing it to prevent Boris breaking laws which don’t seem to exist? It’s corrupt, despicable and an affront to the people of this country.

trackback
Breaking….. Suspicion grows. Are we already out of the EU? | CYBERBORISjohnson

[…] Another article confirming we are out legally the above is here. […]

Julie
Guest
Julie

This is disgusting